Post by NintendoLegend on Feb 4, 2011 17:01:09 GMT -6
Game Theory & Philosophy Forum Guidelines
Purpose: To challenge and grow in perceptions of NES gaming.
Content that is appropriate for new topics on this board:
* Explorations of why retro gaming is still relevant.
* Discussing the criteria that describe other criteria; for example, what does “good” mean on the NES?
*Attempts to specifically define terms; for instance, what exactly qualifies a title as a “shoot-‘em-up?”
* Whereas other boards may draw conclusions, this board asks why and how those conclusions exist
* Theorizing the relationships from game to game, i.e. could Mario have existed without Pac-Man?
Purpose: To challenge and grow in perceptions of NES gaming.
Content that is appropriate for new topics on this board:
* Explorations of why retro gaming is still relevant.
* Discussing the criteria that describe other criteria; for example, what does “good” mean on the NES?
*Attempts to specifically define terms; for instance, what exactly qualifies a title as a “shoot-‘em-up?”
* Whereas other boards may draw conclusions, this board asks why and how those conclusions exist
* Theorizing the relationships from game to game, i.e. could Mario have existed without Pac-Man?